Thursday, February 21, 2013

“FLOW”: HIGH QUALITY EXPERIENCES


“FLOW” OR “HOW TO ACHIEVE HAPPINESS”  


The concept of “FLOW” was described by Professor Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi in his 1990 book (“FLOW”) after years of investigation at the Department of Psychology at the University of Chicago. The book was a best seller. Other books followed, applying the concept to specific areas, including business. You can find some lectures by Professor Csikszentmihalyi in YOUTUBE and other Internet sites. He was for some time the chairman of his Department and later on professor at the Drucker School of Management in California.   

At first sight, “FLOW” sounds like something you would hear from a funny sect or a miraculous technique you would hear about in the TV programs late at night. You can easily imagine the TV host, dressed as a wizard, in a set decorated with planets and horoscope symbols, lecturing about how to get into “flow”.

However, “FLOW” is a well-established concept, used extensively in Positive Psychology. You’ll find an article in the WIKIPEDIA (look for “Flow (psychology)”) and an iPhone App for measuring your flow states (“InFlow” by AITA Ltd). Several investigators in universities around the world have been investigating “flow” in various contexts. For getting a good understanding of the concept, it is necessary (in my opinion) to read Csikszentmihalyi’s book; reading a short description won’t do it. “FLOW” is one of those concepts that are at the same time simple and subtle, close to our knowledge space but at the same time difficult to define the boundaries. In his book, Csikszentmihalyi presents tenths of examples, with chapters dealing with the body (sports, etc.), intellectual activity, the workplace, social life, etc. After going through all those examples, you really get the idea.

The reason for writing a few articles about “FLOW” in this space is to explore its immediate, simple and extremely rewarding application to our work environments. I lived in the past years several situations in which I somehow “knew” we were doing wrong, with a wrong management framework. However, I could not really identify what was wrong, all I had were vague “feelings”. The concept of “FLOW” is invaluable for making sense of a number of these situations.  

WHAT IS “FLOW”? 

FLOW is an experience we all know quite well. Recall a few situations in which you were felt happy, and chances are you were experiencing FLOW. 

A few examples: 
  • you were playing a disputed sports match for some time; it can be tennis, soccer, basketball, baseball, golf or any other sports; you were very concentrated and enjoying it a lot; time passed fast, you couldn’t believe you had been playing for longer than two hours (much longer, if golf)  
  • at work, you were dealing with a sales operation that became more and more difficult; the customer presented several last time conditions; your team didn’t know how to deal with them; you had to figure out new solutions and you had the deadline just ahead; you had to stretch your best skills; in the end, you were proud of the final result – much better than you had imagined in the beginning 
  • you are a student, at any level; in September, you see an area as particularly difficult (it could be Maths, French, Introduction to Quantum Mechanics or Introduction to Heidegger’s Philosophy). You dedicate time and effort to it – and it takes you a lot - and you have good progress. By May, you have mastered the area and are quite comfortable teaching your colleagues. 
  • you are taking care of your baby; she is learning how to walk and she is saying her first words; you enjoy spending your time with her, it is the best time of the day; time goes by and you do not notice it; you both are smiling almost all the time 
  • a musician is playing the piano; he feels challenged by a particularly difficult piece of music; he spends days practicing and figuring out how to best play some parts; after a lot of effort, he can play the whole piece without errors; while playing, he feels his hands go over the keyboard by themselves – he feels he is in “FLOW”  

Csikszentmihalyi used the word FLOW for naming his concept after the word appeared many times in the descriptions of positive experiences provided by several artists and sportsmen he were observing.




[END]

Thursday, January 3, 2013

MOM, DAD AND THE EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE


OUR PARENTS AND THE EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE    

If you are older than 30, your parents almost certainly didn’t know about “emotional intelligence” while they were educating you – unless they were psychologists and were following the discussions triggered by Howard Gardner (from Harvard University) in 1983, after the publication of his book “Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences”. 

“Emotional Intelligence” reached the general public in 1995. Daniel Goleman’s best seller « Emotional Intelligence – Why it can matter more than IQ » combined the work of tenths of investigators in Psychology, presenting their results in an integrated and meaningful way, accessible to us, lay people. The core concept of emotional intelligence was taken from Peter Salovey (Yale University) and John D. Mayer (University of New Hampshire). Seventeen years later, Goleman’s book is still an authoritative reference in the matter, quoted by anyone who writes about Emotional Intelligence. 

WHAT MOM AND DAD TAUGHT US  

The people I know better belong to two groups, in two countries with remarkable differences. Yet, several of the key messages I received from my parents are shared with both groups.

A few of the values and behaviour models Mom and Dad taught me:
  • "Cultivate good feelings and fight the bad ones" 
    • As good persons we are, bad feelings are unwelcome. Lifetime is too precious for wasting it with anger, fear, envy, lust and other bad feelings. 
    • Bad feelings should be suppressed. 
  • "Be « noble » and altruist, display your best face to the world"  
    • Don’t pay too much attention to your feelings; if you do, you become selfish and self-indulgent.  
    • Whether you feel tired, bored, fearful, anxious, etc., keep it to yourself. Your friends and mates do not have to be bothered with your ugly side. 
    • We must give precedence to other people’s needs; our own needs come second or third. 
  • "Children do never think bad of their parents and other key reference people" 
    • Don’t ever feel angry or be disrespectful with them – that’s more than ugly. 
    • Don’t have « inappropriate » feelings (such as sensual attraction towards a beautiful aunt). 
  • "Don’t tell me you are feeling down, depressed; be a man!" 
    • “Depression? What is that? At your age, I had already achieved a lot, under much worse conditions”.  
  • "Life is hard work – don’t expect too much enjoyment" 
    • Life is hard work. If you are having fun, better for you; yet, not having fun is not an excuse for not doing what has to be done. 
    • That applies to jobs, marriage and child rearing. 
  • "When dealing with other people, don’t manipulate, be spontaneous" 
    • The only right way of dealing with friends and acquaintances is to act naturally. 
    • People who do it differently become hypocrites. 
  • "Outbursts of rage are positive" 
    • An enraged man or woman is acting with authenticity. 
    • It is good to have an outburst of rage from time to time (provided it does not end in aggression, of course). It proves you are sincere and committed. 
    • When things get confuse, an outburst of rage can put things in their places.   

And so on. Add to that a set of strict rules applying to the sex realm and we all get the picture. Most heroes we admired in the movies behave in accordance with this model.

There is nothing fundamentally wrong with these values and models. We can rear our children following the same ideas. The issue is that our parents raised us before the current knowledge around «Emotional Intelligence» was available to the general public. As a consequence, the “implementation details” of our education sometimes made us not so smart, in the Emotional Intelligence domain. 

EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE (IN A FEW PARAGRAPHS) 

The model adopted and made popular by Daniel Goleman defines Emotional Intelligence as the combination of 5 skill domains:
1 – Self-awareness
2 – Self-management
3 – Self-mastery  
4 – Empathy
5 – Social arts 


Figure 1 – The emotional intelligence skill sets. 

SELF-AWARENESS
« Recognizing a feeling as it happens is the keystone of emotional intelligence. An inability to notice our true feelings leaves us at their mercy. People with greater certainty about their feelings are better pilots of their lives. «   

SELF-MANAGEMENT
The skills that allow us to avoid « emotional hijacks » by anger, anxiety or depression.
« The capacity to soothe oneself, to shake off rampant anxiety, gloom or irritability. »
« People who are poor in this ability are constantly battling feelings of distress, while those who excel in it bounce back far more quickly from life’s setbacks and upsets. »

SELF-MASTERY  
The ability to « marshal emotions in the service of a goal ».
Being able to keep an optimistic state of mind despite of setbacks.
Being able to go into the « flow » state that takes one to optimal and gratifying experiences and to high performance.

EMPATHY
The ability to recognize emotions in others.
Self-management is a pre-requisite for empathy; a person under « emotional hijack » does not have enough « working space » left in his mind for exercising empathy.

SOCIAL ARTS (HANDLING RELATIONSHIPS)  
The ability to manage emotions in others.
The ability to act taking into account the emotions of our mates.


Picture a group of highly « emotional intelligent » people. What do you see?  
  • They are constantly monitoring their emotional reactions to whatever they go through, in the same way a physician or a psychotherapist is always monitoring his reactions to whatever their patients say. 
  • In a sports game, a defense player won’t allow a player of the other team to move around without careful monitoring; in the same way, the emotional intelligent person is always monitoring her/his own feelings. A feeling that is moving around unattended (such as an outburst of anger) can produce undesirable reactions.  
  • They actively act upon feelings that can escalate in intensity and lead to an « emotional hijack », be them anger, anxiety or sadness. They do never repress or hide such feelings from themselves, but they are always in control. They do not allow strong feelings to “overflow” and blur their conscience.  
  • Sometimes you see they are angry; however, they are always able to manage the energy released by their anger. And sometimes you see they become anxious or sad; however, they are able to prevent such moods to escalate and they recover after a short while.   
  • They show most of the time strong motivation for what they are doing. That is because they know how to marshal their psychic energy and apply it to the task they are committed to.  
  • They are constantly aware of the feelings and concerns of the people around them. They actively invest psychic energy in uncovering other people’s feelings and concerns.  
  • They are excellent at « active listening ».  
  • They are good at the « social arts ». They know how to use other people’s feelings in « win-win » arrangements. They are good at creating bonds with other people.


HOW DOES « EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE » MISMATCH OUR PARENTS’ TEACHINGS 

The way I implemented Mom and Dad’s teachings conflicted with the skill sets of emotional intelligence. I’ve seen the same conflict in friends and acquaintances.

SELF-AWARENESS (the basis of emotional intelligence):
Conflicts with several of Mom and Dad messages: 
-        Fight and hide the bad feelings  
-        Do not spend too much time considering yourself – particularly your feelings (“don’t be selfish!”)
-        Children do never think bad things of their parents and other reference people  
-        Don’t tell me you are feeling down, depressed; be a man!
Mom and Dad’s teachings do not stimulate the practice of self-awareness.

SELF-MANAGEMENT and SELF-MASTERY: 
Conflict with the ideas that
- Outbursts of rage are positive 
- An enraged man or woman is authentic
- "Life is hard work – don’t expect too much enjoyment" 
In my child environment, if you don’t “let go” your anger from time to time, you are not acting naturally. If somebody “pushed your buttons”, you were obliged to strike back. If you didn’t, you were not doing well – something was wrong with you.
Mom and Dad’s teachings do not rule out “emotional hijacks”; they even stimulate them, in moderate doses.
And looking for "enjoyment" at work or even in the marriage is not to be admired. One does what has to be done, full stop. 

EMPATHY: 
Inherits the negative view of giving too much attention to own feelings.
Mom and Dad’s teachings say that whoever demands this kind of attention is not to be admired. He is selfish and self-indulgent, so better not to spend too much attention on him.
Besides, “empathy” is a woman’s thing; men do not care about empathy.

SOCIAL ARTS: 
Conflict with the idea that 
-        When dealing with other people, one must not manipulate and must be spontaneous
Mom and Dad’s teachings say that one should not dedicate energy to purposefully knowing other people’s emotional patterns. Only “bad people”, such as politicians, do such things.


Mom and Dad’s teachings provide us the ethical grounding and warmth we build our life upon. They only have to be updated and adjusted, in order to become fully compatible with the skill sets of the emotional intelligence we need to be more successful in the Internet era.

[END]